Consumer finance lenders serving non-prime and near-prime borrowers face an intensifying challenge: growing portfolios without increasing risk exposure in an environment where nearly 50% of Americans live paycheck-to-paycheck and third-party fraud losses exceed $42.9 billion in 2023 annually.
Traditional credit scoring remains the industry standard, but many lenders are discovering that relying on identical underwriting tools creates fierce competition for the same “safe” applicants while overlooking potentially profitable borrowers who don’t fit conventional risk profiles.
The fundamental problem isn’t fraud or economic pressure alone. Instead, it’s that most lenders use identical data sources, apply similar risk thresholds, and compete for the same pool of borrowers, creating artificial scarcity at the top of the funnel while leaving creditworthy consumers unserved.
The Sameness Problem
Walk into any lending conference and you’ll hear the same vendors pitching the same solutions. Credit scores and alternative data dominate decision-making, supplemented by standard fraud tools that most competitors also use. When everyone applies the same logic to the same data, they inevitably reach similar conclusions about who qualifies for credit.
This dynamic forces lenders into two equally problematic positions: either compete aggressively for the same “approved” applicants, driving up customer acquisition costs, or expand down-market by loosening standards, increasing portfolio risk. Neither approach addresses the underlying issue.
Bank Account Data Fills the Gaps
96% of U.S. households have a bank account, according to a recent FDIC report vs 78% that have a credit score on file.
Bank account data – status, behavior, payment performance – provides a different lens for evaluating creditworthiness. Unlike credit reports, which reflect past borrowing behavior, bank data reveals current financial patterns: income consistency, spending discipline, and account management habits.
Consider two applicants with identical 580 credit scores. Traditional underwriting might treat them similarly. But bank account analysis reveals meaningful differences. One applicant shows steady direct deposits, consistent account balances, and a pattern of paying bills on time. The other demonstrates erratic income, frequent overdrafts, and minimal transaction history. These behavioral patterns offer predictive insights that credit scores alone cannot provide.
Payment intelligence takes this analysis further by examining how consumers interact with recurring obligations. Someone who consistently manages subscription payments, utility bills, and other regular expenses demonstrates financial responsibility even if their credit file shows past difficulties.
Fraud Detection Through Behavioral Patterns
Sophisticated fraudsters have learned to game traditional verification systems. They obtain legitimate Social Security numbers, create plausible employment histories, and present applications that pass basic fraud checks. But bank account data can expose these schemes through behavioral inconsistencies like multiple SSNs or phone numbers tied to a single account. Synthetic identity fraud represents a growing threat where criminals combine real and fictitious information to create false identities.
By analyzing relationships between identity, bank account and payment behavior over time; such as velocity, recency, and anomalies, patterns become visible. A single verification point might appear legitimate, but the combination reveals fraudulent intent. Without advanced fraud detection rooted in behavioral patterns, lenders risk approving accounts that lead to defaults, NSFs, or costly operational delays.
Start Small for Real Results
Lenders worry that adopting bank account data requires extensive system changes or lengthy integration projects. However, modern platforms use API-driven architectures that easily layer onto existing workflows, allowing lenders to start small, such as analyzing bank account behavior for specific applicant segments. Within weeks, many discover they’ve been declining qualified borrowers who show strong payment capacity, while also uncovering fraud patterns missed by traditional tools. Portfolio performance becomes the clearest measure of success: first-payment defaults drop, fraud losses decline, and customer acquisition costs improve as lenders identify and approve overlooked applicants with high intent and lower risk.
Building Competitive Advantage
Lenders seeing the strongest performance aren’t abandoning credit scores and alternative data, they’re enhancing them with new credit intelligence. By layering bank account data, payment behavior, and identity validation on top of traditional credit metrics, lenders gain a more precise view of borrower risk. This approach enables segmentation beyond score bands, revealing behavioral patterns that distinguish financially capable borrowers from those with unstable banking activity. Someone with a low credit score due to medical debt might show excellent account management and steady income, warranting different treatment than someone with similar credit scores but chaotic banking behavior.
By layering in the ability to interpret and act on bank-level data creates a competitive edge. Lenders who adopt this intelligence can identify overlooked creditworthy borrowers while maintaining strong fraud defenses, turning industry challenges into competitive opportunities.
Article featured in Non-Prime Times, see original here: Beyond Credit Scores — How Smart Data Strategies Are Unlocking Growth in Consumer Lending – Non Prime Times
John Gordon is the CEO of ValidiFI, the leading provider of predictive bank account and payment intelligence.